facebook

University of North Texas

Educator Preparation Program

Texas Education Agency EPP Candidate Exit Survey

Satisfaction of Completers (Component 4.4 | A.4.2)

EPP Candidate Exit Survey Responses

2018-2019

2017-2018

2016-2017

 

Q4. To what extent were you prepared to effectively implement the discipline-management procedures approved by the campus?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

65%

66%

68%

• Sufficiently prepared

31%

32%

31%

• Not sufficiently prepared

4%

1%

1%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

Q5. To what extent were you prepared to communicate clear expectations for achievement and behavior that promote and encourage self-discipline and self-directed learning?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

80%

76%

76%

• Sufficiently prepared

18%

23%

23%

• Not sufficiently prepared

1%

1%

1%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

Q6. To what extent were you prepared to provide support to achieve a positive, equitable, and engaging learning environment?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

85%

83%

84%

• Sufficiently prepared

15%

16%

16%

• Not sufficiently prepared

0%

0%

0%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

Q7. To what extent were you prepared to build and maintain positive rapport with students?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

87%

84%

86%

• Sufficiently prepared

12%

15%

14%

• Not sufficiently prepared

0%

1%

1%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

Q8. To what extent were you prepared to build and maintain positive rapport and two-way communication with students' families?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

58%

61%

64%

• Sufficiently prepared

33%

35%

32%

• Not sufficiently prepared

7%

4%

4%

• Not at all prepared

1%

0%

0%

 

Q9. To what extent were you prepared to implement varied instruction that integrates critical thinking, inquiry, and problem solving?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

76%

77%

76%

• Sufficiently prepared

22%

22%

22%

• Not sufficiently prepared

1%

1%

2%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

 Q10. To what extent were you prepared to respond to the needs of students by being flexible in instructional approach and differentiating instruction?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

75%

79%

79%

• Sufficiently prepared

24%

19%

19%

• Not sufficiently prepared

1%

2%

1%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

Q11. To what extent were you prepared to use the results of formative assessment data to guide instruction?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

69%

70%

71%

• Sufficiently prepared

28%

27%

25%

• Not sufficiently prepared

3%

2%

3%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

1%

 

 

 

 

Q12. To what extent were you prepared to engage and motivate students through learner-centered instruction?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

79%

77%

77%

• Sufficiently prepared

20%

22%

22%

• Not sufficiently prepared

1%

1%

1%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q13. To what extent were you prepared to integrate effective modeling, questioning, and self-reflection (self-assessment) strategies into instruction?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

80%

78%

78%

• Sufficiently prepared

19%

22%

21%

• Not sufficiently prepared

1%

0%

0%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q14. To what extent were you prepared to assume various roles in the instructional process (e.g. instructor, facilitator, audience)?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

78%

77%

78%

• Sufficiently prepared

21%

21%

21%

• Not sufficiently prepared

1%

1%

1%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q15. To what extent were you prepared to set clear learning goals and align instruction with standards based content?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

81%

80%

81%

• Sufficiently prepared

18%

19%

18%

• Not sufficiently prepared

1%

1%

1%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q16. To what extent were you prepared to provide quality and timely feedback to students?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

76%

77%

79%

• Sufficiently prepared

23%

22%

20%

• Not sufficiently prepared

0%

1%

1%

• Not at all prepared

1%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q18. To what extent were you prepared to differentiate instruction to meet the academic needs of students with disabilities?

N = 439

N = 480

N = 485

• Well prepared

52%

54%

56%

• Sufficiently prepared

42%

41%

38%

• Not sufficiently prepared

6%

4%

6%

• Not at all prepared

1%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q19. To what extent were you prepared to differentiate instruction to meet the behavioral needs of students with disabilities?

N = 439

N = 480

N = 485

• Well prepared

52%

56%

58%

• Sufficiently prepared

39%

38%

33%

• Not sufficiently prepared

8%

5%

9%

• Not at all prepared

1%

1%

1%

 

 

 

 

Q20. To what extent were you prepared to provide appropriate ways for students with disabilities to demonstrate their learning?

N = 439

N = 480

N = 485

• Well prepared

58%

57%

60%

• Sufficiently prepared

35%

36%

34%

• Not sufficiently prepared

6%

6%

6%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q21. To what extent were you prepared to understand and adhere to the federal and state laws that govern special education services?

N = 439

N = 480

N = 485

• Well prepared

62%

61%

63%

• Sufficiently prepared

33%

34%

31%

• Not sufficiently prepared

4%

5%

6%

• Not at all prepared

0%

1%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q22. To what extent were you prepared to make appropriate decisions (e.g., when and how to make accommodations and/or modifications to instruction, assessment, materials, delivery, and classroom procedures) to meet the learning needs of students who have an Individualized Education Program (IEP)?

N = 439

N = 480

N = 485

• Well prepared

58%

60%

60%

• Sufficiently prepared

37%

34%

34%

• Not sufficiently prepared

5%

5%

6%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q23. To what extent were you prepared to develop and/or implement formal assessments and informal assessments that track students' progress toward IEP goals and

 

 

 

objectives?

N = 439

N = 480

N = 485

• Well prepared

56%

56%

56%

• Sufficiently prepared

36%

35%

34%

• Not sufficiently prepared

8%

8%

9%

• Not at all prepared

1%

0%

1%

 

 

 

 

Q24. To what extent were you prepared to collaborate with others, such as para-educators and other teachers, in meeting the academic, developmental, and behavioral needs of students with disabilities?

N = 439

N = 480

N = 485

• Well prepared

66%

67%

68%

• Sufficiently prepared

29%

29%

27%

• Not sufficiently prepared

4%

3%

5%

• Not at all prepared

1%

1%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q26. To what extent were you prepared to provide appropriate ways for LEP-ELL students to demonstrate their learning?

N = 377

N = 440

N = 420

• Well prepared

65%

68%

68%

• Sufficiently prepared

30%

30%

29%

• Not sufficiently prepared

5%

2%

3%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q27. To what extent were you prepared to understand and adhere to federal and state laws that govern education services for LEP-ELL students?

N = 377

N = 440

N = 420

• Well prepared

69%

66%

68%

• Sufficiently prepared

27%

31%

28%

• Not sufficiently prepared

3%

3%

4%

• Not at all prepared

1%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q28. To what extent were you prepared to comply with district and campus policies and procedures regarding LEP-ELL students?

N = 377

N = 440

N = 420

• Well prepared

68%

68%

69%

• Sufficiently prepared

29%

29%

28%

• Not sufficiently prepared

3%

3%

3%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q29. To what extent were you prepared to support LEP-ELL students in mastering the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS), including the English Language

 

 

 

Proficiency Standards (ELPS)?

N = 377

N = 440

N = 420

• Well prepared

66%

67%

69%

• Sufficiently prepared

30%

30%

27%

• Not sufficiently prepared

5%

2%

3%

• Not at all prepared

0%

1%

1%

 

 

 

 

Q30. To what extent were you prepared to model and teach the forms and functions of academic English in content areas?

N = 377

N = 440

N = 420

• Well prepared

68%

68%

68%

• Sufficiently prepared

29%

30%

29%

• Not sufficiently prepared

3%

2%

3%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q31. To what extent were you prepared to use technology available on the campus to integrate curriculum TEKS and Technology Applications TEKS to support student learning?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

71%

74%

72%

• Sufficiently prepared

26%

24%

24%

• Not sufficiently prepared

2%

2%

3%

• Not at all prepared

0%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q32. To what extent were you prepared to provide technology based classroom learning opportunities that allow students to interact with real-time and/or online content?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

68%

70%

67%

• Sufficiently prepared

28%

26%

28%

• Not sufficiently prepared

4%

4%

4%

• Not at all prepared

1%

0%

1%

 

 

 

 

Q33. To what extent were you prepared to teach students developmentally appropriate technology skills?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

67%

67%

66%

• Sufficiently prepared

28%

30%

30%

• Not sufficiently prepared

5%

3%

4%

• Not at all prepared

1%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q34. To what extent were you prepared to use technology to make learning more active and engaging for students?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

74%

75%

74%

• Sufficiently prepared

22%

23%

24%

• Not sufficiently prepared

3%

2%

2%

• Not at all prepared

1%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

Q35. To what extent were you prepared to use available technology to collect, manage, and analyze student data using software programs (such as Excel or an electronic grade book)?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

56%

58%

59%

• Sufficiently prepared

34%

34%

34%

• Not sufficiently prepared

8%

7%

6%

• Not at all prepared

2%

1%

1%

 

 

 

 

Q36. To what extent were you prepared to use available technology to collect, manage, and analyze data from multiple sources in order to interpret learning

 

 

 

results for students?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

56%

59%

59%

• Sufficiently prepared

35%

33%

32%

• Not sufficiently prepared

8%

6%

8%

• Not at all prepared

2%

1%

1%

 

 

 

 

Q37. To what extent were you prepared to use available technology to document student learning to determine when an intervention is necessary and appropriate?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

54%

59%

59%

• Sufficiently prepared

35%

33%

34%

• Not sufficiently prepared

9%

6%

6%

• Not at all prepared

2%

1%

1%

 

 

 

 

Q38. To what extent were you prepared to use available technology to collect and manage formative assessment data to guide instruction?

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• Well prepared

59%

61%

61%

• Sufficiently prepared

33%

33%

31%

• Not sufficiently prepared

7%

5%

7%

• Not at all prepared

1%

1%

1%

 

 

 

 

Q53. What is your overall evaluation of how well the educator preparation program prepared you? Select the one statement that most closely matches your current overall perspective on the program.

N = 496

N = 554

N = 570

• I was well prepared by the program for the first year of teaching.

75%

72%

72%

• I was sufficiently prepared by the program for the first year of teaching.

24%

27%

27%

• I was not sufficiently prepared by the program for the first year of teaching.

1%

0%

1%

• I was not at all prepared by the program for the first year of teaching.

0%

0%

0%